<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cool Marketing Stuff &#187; broken glass theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coolmarketingstuff.com/tag/broken-glass-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coolmarketingstuff.com</link>
	<description>Recommended marketing books, resources, and tools.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:35:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Managing the Environment: A Study on the Broken Window Theory</title>
		<link>http://coolmarketingstuff.com/managing-the-environment-a-study-on-the-broken-window-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://coolmarketingstuff.com/managing-the-environment-a-study-on-the-broken-window-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken glass theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suggestions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coolmarketingstuff.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.coolmarketingstuff.com/images/brokenwindow.jpg" alt="marketing content" width="140" height="140" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>by <a title="brand new" href="http://garethkay.typepad.com/brand_new/">Gareth Kay</a></em></p>
<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right; margin: 10px;" src="http://www.coolmarketingstuff.com/images/brokenwindow.jpg" alt="" width="318" height="318" />There&#8217;s a ton of good stuff out there about how people really do things, and how behavior really spreads (Mark clearly has contributed a huge amount to this).  And as someone working in advertising, it&#8217;s often quite depressing learning that it&#8217;s not what we do that really matters, but what people do to what we do; that advertising hasn&#8217;t got the strong influence we might like to think it does (shock horror, people don&#8217;t do what we tell them or think about things how we ask them to).</p>
<p>So, is there a role and future for communications?  Well, perhaps there is but it&#8217;s a little different to what we tend to think.  This week&#8217;s New Scientist has an excellent article about some research at the University of Groningen that empirically proves the &#8216;broken window&#8217; theory. Here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the most striking experiment, Keizer left a €5 note protruding from a fully addressed envelope that itself was poking out of a mailbox. The team discovered that people were less likely to steal the money if there was no graffiti or litter on or around the mailbox.</p>
<p>With no litter or graffiti, 13% of the passers-by stole the money. Thefts doubled to 27% when the mailbox was daubed with graffiti, or to 25% when it was surrounded by litter. &#8220;It&#8217;s quite shocking that the mere presence of litter doubled the number of people stealing,&#8221; says Keizer.</p>
<p>In another experiment, motorists returning to collect their cars were three times more likely to trespass through an illegal, 200-metre short-cut to the car park if bicycles had been illegally locked to railings next to the forbidden entrance.</p>
<p>A massive 87% took the short cut when they saw the illegally parked bicycles, despite a police sign saying &#8220;No Trespassing&#8221;. This compared with 27% trespassing when the bicycles were not locked to the fence.</p>
<p>Another experiment in a cycle park bearing a clear anti-graffiti sign, revealed that cyclists were twice as likely to leave litter if the researchers had daubed graffiti on the walls. The team attached bogus flyers to the bikes&#8217; handlebars to put the owners in a situation where they had to decide whether or not to litter.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, perhaps we should think about communications as being more about environment management, creating an environment where people are more likely to behave in a favorable way. About seeding the right environment where behavior is more likely to take hold.  Which puts us squarely back in the culture business&#8230;</p>
<p>Image by <a title="flickr marketing" href="http://flickr.com/photos/nesster/">Nesster</a></p>
<p><em>You can read more great marketing content by Gareth Kay at his blog <a href="http://garethkay.typepad.com/brand_new/">Brand New</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coolmarketingstuff.com/managing-the-environment-a-study-on-the-broken-window-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

