<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Wrong With Microsoft&#8217;s Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coolmarketingstuff.com/whats-wrong-with-microsofts-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coolmarketingstuff.com/whats-wrong-with-microsofts-marketing/</link>
	<description>Recommended marketing books, resources, and tools.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karol Zielinski</title>
		<link>http://coolmarketingstuff.com/whats-wrong-with-microsofts-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol Zielinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coolmarketingstuff.com/?p=321#comment-797</guid>
		<description>There are few good Microsoft&#039;s ads... but still most of them are not so good.

I was writing about it few days ago, so more examples of Microsoft&#039;s ads you can find here: http://blog.karolzielinski.com/microsoft-ad-its-really-good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are few good Microsoft&#8217;s ads&#8230; but still most of them are not so good.</p>
<p>I was writing about it few days ago, so more examples of Microsoft&#8217;s ads you can find here: <a href="http://blog.karolzielinski.com/microsoft-ad-its-really-good" rel="nofollow">http://blog.karolzielinski.com/microsoft-ad-its-really-good</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://coolmarketingstuff.com/whats-wrong-with-microsofts-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coolmarketingstuff.com/?p=321#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment.

I do say in the post that I&#039;m not sure that the first video is an actual commercial or a joke. 

In the Lauren ad, I think most people would think that Microsoft is implying that they are interviewing a random person that was selected to participate in a &quot;contest&quot;. Would the typical person assume that Microsoft hired an actor to pretend to be participating in a contest. Of course not. I&#039;m not saying they are lying by editing the ad, but they are being misleading and inauthentic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>I do say in the post that I&#8217;m not sure that the first video is an actual commercial or a joke. </p>
<p>In the Lauren ad, I think most people would think that Microsoft is implying that they are interviewing a random person that was selected to participate in a &#8220;contest&#8221;. Would the typical person assume that Microsoft hired an actor to pretend to be participating in a contest. Of course not. I&#8217;m not saying they are lying by editing the ad, but they are being misleading and inauthentic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://coolmarketingstuff.com/whats-wrong-with-microsofts-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coolmarketingstuff.com/?p=321#comment-791</guid>
		<description>not sure why you&#039;re calling the first vid a commercial at all.  It&#039;s 4+ minutes long, so I&#039;m not sure what the distribution would be.  It reads like some kind of internal proof-of-concept video that leaked. 

the second video is too much of an obvious troll.  Do we honestly not understand that &quot;Lauren&quot; is an actress, and the final product is an edited video?  Odd to equate MS &quot;lying&quot; with &quot;shooting and editing a commercial.&quot;  It&#039;s not like it claims to be an objective documentary anywhere...

Strange post, overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure why you&#8217;re calling the first vid a commercial at all.  It&#8217;s 4+ minutes long, so I&#8217;m not sure what the distribution would be.  It reads like some kind of internal proof-of-concept video that leaked. </p>
<p>the second video is too much of an obvious troll.  Do we honestly not understand that &#8220;Lauren&#8221; is an actress, and the final product is an edited video?  Odd to equate MS &#8220;lying&#8221; with &#8220;shooting and editing a commercial.&#8221;  It&#8217;s not like it claims to be an objective documentary anywhere&#8230;</p>
<p>Strange post, overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

